While PSRAM definitely requires special software support, I don’t see why WebMite would not actually work with the WiFi on the Pico Plus 2W unless it specifically relies on the flash being 4 MiB and specifically breaks compatibility with the Pico Plus 2W’s 16 MiB flash (which is difficult for me to see being the case, but could be in theory).
Reading is very important, what did I write ? WIFI + PSRAM, not Wifi only.
https://forum.clockworkpi.com/t/can-psram-be-used-on-pimoroni-pico-plus-2w/18127
I can confirm, I studied the source code, I know why it does not work and I know why the author will not change that fact. Maybe I should ……
Sigh. I did read what you said, you were just unclear ─ “WIFI + PSRAM” can clearly be easily read as “WIFI and PSRAM”, which is precisely how I read your comment.
And I know full well how PSRAM on the Pico Plus 2W works, as I wrote a driver for it for zeptoforth. If you don’t write driver support for it it will never work, and it is a separate block of (significantly slower) memory from SRAM, so it does not just magically expand the amount of RAM available to the application without special application support.
(In the case of zeptoforth I decided to make there be an option to use it as a RAM disk, which is what my zeptoforth installer configures it to be used as.)