It’s due to an international export law placed on China. Because the product is being distributed out of country is must have the certification attached to it that says the onboard connectivity components aren’t for espionage or have remote control (kill-switch) capabilities. Just because some people have ordered WiFi only devices or live in China, doesn’t mean the certification process doesn’t apply to them. It’s the product as a whole, not the individual components that may or may not be included. It’s a standard that brings all other standards up to it’s level. It’s a pretty common thing for Chinese export electronics in the last couple of years.
As Mr. Duan stated, the supplier/manufacturer of the 4G is being asked to provide certification on its hardware. If they don’t have it, the product and export registration would have to be re submitted, and the 4G components excluded from the capabilities/inclusion of the kit (which would probably take a few more months at best). If they do have the documents, then it’s a matter of getting that to the right people and playing the waiting game. This is all your run-of-the-mill bureaucracy, it takes awhile.
If you’re referring to remote controlled, as in RC cars/planes/drones, that’s not the issue here. There were smart phones being sold to the US that had a man-in-the-middle control built into them that caused this. Remote control in this context means the manufacturer or a 3rd party can kill the phone remotely if they feel their ToS are being breached (or for whatever reason), or personal information can be extracted despite the encryption of the signal being transmitted or received.
首先，这里并没有标记 English Only, 所以我在这里使用中文并没有什么问题。
然后，官方作为中国厂商， 我觉得使用中文能让他们更方便理解（毕竟 中译英，英译中，可能会丢失信息
最后，当我使用中文的时候，说明我的诉说对象是中国人，加上英语只是表示礼貌。
至于是否和英语内容相同，请善用翻译工具。
First of all, there is no “English Only” tag here, so there is no problem with using Chinese.
Secondly, as an official Chinese company, I believe using Chinese would make it easier for them to understand (as translation between Chinese and English may result in information loss).
Lastly, when I use Chinese, it indicates that my intended audience is Chinese, and adding English is just a matter of politeness.
As for whether the content is the same in English, please make use of translation tools.
Personally, Chinese is my mother tongue. I can express my meaning more clearly in Chinese. English is translated by me using translation software, and I have done my best to check to make it consistent. I am worried that there may be conflicts between the two, so the original text is attached. When encountering ambiguity, a third party can also provide language help.
I agree that everyone in the forum communicates in the common language (English), and I do the same. But if even this kind of behavior is banned, it will be quite unfriendly to non-native English speakers (not just Chinese). The text translated by these people with translation software may not be able to express their true meaning, and it is difficult for outsiders to provide more help when there are differences in understanding.
I know there are subforums for other languages in the forum. But the activity inside is very low, most of them (except for Chinese) don’t have a single post, and the officials are not even willing to issue consultations and announcements in it. If you insist that the main board be free of any characters other than English, and non-English users have to discuss in its sub-board, I don’t think it’s any different than telling them “please get out of this forum”.
With my career experience, a lot of the world does. Sigh.
Personally, I’d love a feature in Excel that requires an approval from an individual that is “certified in Excel”, making it an “are you really sure” check prior. The same goes for those individuals that would be “certified”. They still require a peer review prior. Maybe that’s where the MS Office Copilot stuff comes in.
Malbolge…? Oh, interesting. When asked, Google regurgitated the following:
“Malbolge (/mælˈboʊldʒ/) is a public domain esoteric programming language invented by Ben Olmstead in 1998, named after the eighth circle of hell in Dante’s Inferno, the Malebolge. This esolang is considered to be the most complicated programming language.”
Meet in the middle, lets go Holy C to combat SPV’s recommendation.
